Theories in Childhood Development - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 845 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2019/03/13 Category Sociology Essay Level High school Tags: Childhood Essay Did you like this example? There are many theories that focus on understanding childhood development. Different theorists focus on understanding different areas of development, while others have analyzed the same areas but came to different conclusions. The importance in understanding these theories is twofold; an educator can use these theories to monitor childrens development, and can implement ideas and practices that are appropriate according to these theories. According to Chalesworth (2017), Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotskys theories are the most commonly used and applied theorys in early childhood development and education (Chap. 1 1-4b). Jean Piagets theory of cognitive development, focuses on the four stages of childhood cognitive development, sensory motor stage, pre-operational stage, concrete operational stage, and formal operational stage. This theory would not rationalize an educator creating a curriculum or educational setting for children, without prior assessment as to which stage they are at. As an educator I only read books, or tell stories that are age appropriate. Stories or books which focus on abstract thinking, philosophical, or moral thoughts, are not appropriate for young children. Young children at this stage are still developing basic logic, and cannot comprehend complex thoughts. As an educator I never assume a child understands a message or idea that I am giving over, I always ask them questions which clarify that they fully understand. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Theories in Childhood Development" essay for you Create order As an educator, I realize how sometimes children are extremely excited with their cognitive revelation. A child can sometime excitedly tell a teacher; see I figured out how to do this puzzle, or they tell their teacher excitedly how they found a connection between two concepts. This excitement stems from a child realizing that they have grown in their cognitive abilities, and they are so proud of that revelation. When a child shows such excitement, I make sure to share in their excitement. I realize that what they are truly proud about is their cognitive growth. Lev Vygotskys theory of sociocultural development, focuses on how the social interactions that children experience impact their cognition. He theorized that much of their learning experience, is learned through social interactions. In addition he theorized that what truly impacts their learning, is their interactions with a more knowledgeable person than themselves. The zone of proximal development, is the area where children can achieve success with the help of a more able person. Vygotsky theorized that learning occurs mainly in this area, and children improve their skills as their ZPD expands. The way they expend their ZPD is through scaffolding. Charlesworth (2017) explains that according to Vygotsky it is important to provide children the right kind of support at the right time (Chap. 9 9-4b). According to this theory it would not be appropriate for an educator of young children to teach the class in a manner where the teacher just delivers the lessons without personal interactions. Children need these interactions with adults in order to thrive in their cognitive skills. As an educator, I always try my best to make my lessons as personal as possible, and I address each child according to their needs. This enables more interactions with the children, and helps them grow in their cognitive abilities. Eric Eriksons theory of psychosocial development, is a theory that interest me in understanding, and I would definitely study it in more depth. His theory is all about how humans discover who they are, and there are stages that a person passes, in which they develop these feelings correctly. Erik Erikson believes that the development of these stages, can be all the difference between a happy confident person vs. a depressed person, a kind and loving person vs. an isolated and insecure person. Being an educator of young children, I feel obligated to further study this theory. Understanding it would help me shape these children into emotionally healthy people. I would use the knowledge of this theory to identify childrens emotional needs, and properly respond to those needs. Bronfenbrenners ecological theory, divides the environment into four levels, each level can impact a person differently. Although Bronfenbrenner may be correct that there are different levels of environmental influences on the development of a person, I would not implement his theory as a rule. There are no two people alike; to one person growing up in a troubled home can be the worst thing, while to the other they can grow tremendously from the experience. As an educator, I would not come to conclusions based on this theory, for example, I would not let the child from the troubled home take advantage of his situation. I would analyze their temperament before drawing conclusions as to how to treat them. As an educator I understand that although some things may seem very petty, it can feel like the biggest catastrophe for the child. Conclusion These theorists among many others, have helped us in understanding the development of children in many areas. Implementing these theories can help in advancing the success in education. Educators can use these theories and implement effective teaching techniques and strategies, in order to give children a better chance to reach their fullest potential.

Shutter Island Multiple Mental Illnesses - 1366 Words

Shutter Island portrays multiple mental illnesses in the main character as well as in supporting characters. One might call it an abnormal psychology â€Å"goldmine.† It takes place at a water-bound psychiatric facility, Shutter Island, housing the criminally insane. The plot is about a man who refers to himself as Teddy. He believes he and his partner are detectives, on the island, to investigate the disappearance of a patient. He is also in search of a patient named Andrew Laeddis, who Teddy believes murdered his wife. The detective becomes paranoid that the facility is treating the patients unfairly and performing experimental lobotomies. The delusion goes on for several months, Teddy never realizing he is actually a patient, until he is brought back to reality at the climax of the movie. His delusion ends. He realizes he’s a patient for a very short amount of time before he goes back to believing he’s a detective. The delusion starts all over again. Throughou t most of the film, viewers see his delusion as a reality, until the twist at the end when it is revealed that he is actually a patient. Teddy is actually a counter personality of Andrew Laeddis, the patient he sought out to avenge his wife’s murder. In previous years, Andrew was a World War II veteran, who helped free Jews at the Nazi concentration camps. He coped with his symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder by drinking alcohol and spending all of his time at work. He emotional detached himself from his bipolarShow MoreRelatedLost Along the Way827 Words   |  3 Pagesbeginning to end. The movie Shutter Island is one such film that is just that, and the characters in question are one Teddy Daniels, and the remote and ghost-like Andrew Laeddiss. They are two different characters, but one and the same mysterious person, struggling to find his way. Having gone through some traumatic events in his life, he ended up developing mental illnesses, such as Post-Traumatic Str ess Disorder (PTSD) and Delusional Disorder. Dealing with multiple illnesses is something that is veryRead MoreA Beautiful Mind By John Nash997 Words   |  4 Pagesexhibits schizophrenic tendencies these two scenes, and periodically throughout the movie. Shutter Island, displays a similar illness known as delusional disorder. Teddy Daniels, the main character demonstrates a number of notable symptoms throughout the film. Upon Teddy’s introduction, we learn he is a U.S. Marshal en route to Shutter island to investigate the escape of a dangerous patient from its mental asylum. Following several suspicious events occurring over the course of the investigationRead MoreNature Of Symptoms And Diagnosis1694 Words   |  7 Pagessecondary. Dissociative Identity Disorder is characterized by the presence of two or more distinct personality states. The multiple personalities differ in many areas including affect, behavior, memory, perception, cognition, and sensory and motor function. The disorder causes great distress and/or impairment in the individual who suffers from it. In the movie Shutter Island, Teddy suffers from identities. His main personality, or host, is discovered at the end of the movie to be Laeddis. His secondaryRead MoreThe Different Types Of Mental Illness And Disorders That Are Linked With Violence Essay1801 Words   |  8 Pages The perception around those who suffer from mental illnesses are more likely to be violent, or are known to be dangerous, has been persistent throughout history. With further investigations, studies, and assessments the understanding of mental illness, what causes it and what treatments work has improved, but the social and public perceptions have not (Link, Phelan et al. 1999). In this essay, I am going to look into the different types of mental illness and disorders that are closely linked with

The Heavy Bear Who Goes With Me free essay sample

Essay, Research Paper The Heavy Bear Who Goes With Me Alcohol, likely the oldest drug known, has been used since the earliest of societies for jubilation, rites, and other societal state of affairss. In the early 1920? s, society viewed intoxicant as more of a societal job. The 18th amendment was passed to criminalize the ingestion, sale, or trade of intoxicant. This action caused much more delinquency, as a consequence of mobsters, and other organized offenses against the authorities. Prohibition was abolished with the 21st amendment in 1933. The verse form? The Heavy Bear Who Goes With Me? was written merely a few old ages after prohibition and reflects the true nature of alcohol addiction. Although alcohol addiction was still frowned upon in this epoch, Schwartz uses a bear to expose and reflect the true nature of alcohol addiction. In the last stanza, ? The secret life of belly and cram? shows that Schwartz feels that alcohol addiction is still unacceptable behaviour. We will write a custom essay sample on The Heavy Bear Who Goes With Me or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Schwartz uses physical, emotional, and psychological facets of a bear to explicate the nature of alcohol addiction. Schwartz gives the bear human features that would be true of an alky, ? Clumsy and pounding here and at that place? and? In love with confect, choler, and sleep. ? Much like bears, people who are alkies, may see a great trade of trouble maintaining his/her balance or commanding their emotions. Schwartz furthers this metaphor of an alcoholic by demoing a physical dependance: ? Trembless and shows the darkness beneath. ? Due to withdrawal, an alky may wake up in the forenoon with shudders and hurt that require a drink for alleviation. The bear is besides eager to steep his physical demand as shown in the line, ? A multiplex honey to smear on his face. ? This strong demand for intoxicant outweighs what a individual knows and understands about the consequence on the organic structure. Schwartz conveys to his readers that alcohol addiction is an inevitable load. He tells us the bear is? That ineluctable carnal walks with me / Moves where I move, falsifying my gesture. ? It is evident that Schwartz feels that alcohol addiction is a load. Conflicts with civilization may do it hard for some people to develop their ain stable attitudes and moderate forms of imbibing. An alcoholic may experience the imbibing is a manner to go more sociable or alter their temper. The writer shows that although the bear appears to be confident, he has many insecurities, ? The tittuping exhibitionist is terrified, dressed in his dress-suit. ? Schwartz shows an unhealthy connexion to imbibing, ? A sugariness confidant as the Waterss clasp. ? This line explains the emotional clasp intoxicant has over the bear. Using the word? confidant, ? he portions with the readers what a really personal issue this is for an alky. When he describes the? Waterss clasp, ? the reader is able to understand what a strong appreciation intoxicant has over him. The bear? Howls in his slumber because of the tightrope? to further explicate the emotional hurting associated with this unwellness. Along with physical and emotional duress, the psychological science of an alky is a deep, repeating issue. An alky who has sustained from imbibing is referred to as a? retrieving alcoholic, ? non as a? cured alcoholic. ? The writer is unable to freely acknowledge this is a job for him ; he uses the bear as a whipping boy. Schwartz tells us the narrative of the bear on his dorsum. He leads the readers to believe that if it weren? T for the bear that everything would be O.K. . He states, ? With whom I would walk without him near. ? If the writer could make this and go forth his intolerable jobs, he feels it? would bare my bosom and do me clear. ? An alcoholic must acknowledge that he or she is powerless over intoxicant, and seek aid from a higher power in recovering control of his or her life. Alcoholism is an highly serious job it both today as it was yesterday. The verse form? The Heavy Bear Who Goes With Me? was written to expose a serious job in an epoch where there was small or no aid for this serious unwellness. The upset is marked by extreme or compulsive usage of intoxicant. This dismaying disease work stoppages 1000000s of Americans, ? The scrimmage of appetency everywhere. ? Schwartz ailments of the bear and depict it as a go oning job throughout society. The writer is able to joint the earnestness of alcohol addiction utilizing metaphors of a bear. A reader must read between the lines to understand how Schwartz conveys that alcohol addiction affects a individual physically, emotionally, and psychologically.

Lord Of The Flies Essays (250 words) - Fiction, Literature, Allegory

Lord Of The Flies In the book The Lord of the Flies the beast turns out to be the boys worst enemy even though it never really existed. The beast turned out to be the boys themselves. They were all scared the beast would kill them, but they ended up hurting or killing themselves just by defending themselves from the so called ?beast.? The first sign of the beast was when the boys were first scared. When the little boy told the rest of the boys about the ?snake-thing? he saw in the woods he refers to it as the beastie. None of the boys really believe him, but in all their minds it gets them thinking and worring about what's on the island, and if there are any beasts of some sort. The beast occurs any time the boys are frightened. If they hear a noise in the woods it must have be the beast. If they see something that scares them it must be the beast. This freightenment works the boys up so much that their primary goal is to kill the beast. In the end they kill themselves, and they realize that they were running from themselves. The beast never existed anywhere, but in their heads. I think the author, Golding, felt the same why when he wrote the book. The beast is the boys, and it ends up being their worst nightmare, and they don't even know it. That interpetation of the beast changed throughout the book and i began to realize what the author meant by ?the beast.?